Home | Log In | Register | Calendar | Search | Help
   
The CQI Message Board > Qualityworld > Join the debate > OHSAS 18000  
Forum Quick Jump
 

The CQI reserves the right to reproduce material from this forum in other published material

New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

Tom Pleasant
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to Tom PleasantAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Feb 2007
Total Posts : 8
 
   Posted 04/04/2007 12:34 (GMT +1)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
April's helpdesk examines the changes to OHSAS 18000. Do you think there should be an ISO standard for health and safety?
Back to Top
 

David Montgomery
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to David MontgomeryAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined May 2007
Total Posts : 1
 
   Posted 02/05/2007 10:34 (GMT +1)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Is the new draft available for viewing anywhere?
Back to Top
 

Tom Pleasant
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to Tom PleasantAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Feb 2007
Total Posts : 8
 
   Posted 02/05/2007 11:13 (GMT +1)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Since the publication of the guidance document OHSAS 18002 there have been ongoing discussions at ISO, the International Labour Organization (ILO) and the European Comittee for Standardization (CEN). ISO is consulting with ILO about a guidance standard and CEN is waiting to see if there is a consensus between them. If not then it will consider creating a European standardisation itself. ILO will hold a conference in June to discuss the matter.

To answer your question then: not really. There are various agenda and reports discussing that the three shall be discussing a discussion at some future discussion but little real information about the working reality of their plans. For example:
www.ilo.org/ilolex/cgi-lex/convde.pl?C187
www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/gb/docs/gb297/pdf/gb-19-4.pdf

We shall have to wait until the ILO's conference in June

Post Edited By Moderator (Steve Coles) : 5/2/2007 12:01:22 PM GMT

Back to Top
 

Steve Coles
*********

Email Address Not AvailableClick to visit Steve Coles's website.Send a Private Message to Steve ColesAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Aug 2004
Total Posts : 405
 
   Posted 02/05/2007 13:04 (GMT +1)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Tom.

Edited your post to make the two URLs live -makes it quicker and easier for readers to go to them; hope you don't mind.


Steve
<><

Back to Top
 

David Hoyle
Registered Member

Click to send David Hoyle email.Click to visit David Hoyle's website.Send a Private Message to David HoyleAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Oct 2005
Total Posts : 484
 
   Posted 21/05/2007 12:55 (GMT +1)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
In response to your initial question Tom, shouild there be an ISO standard for health and safety I presume you meant health and safty management systems rather than health and safey specifically.
 
I for one, don't think any more management system standards are necessary. Organizations only have one management system but the standards bodies seem to think they have as many systems as they have objectives. If we work on the premise that the goal of any organization is to satisfy the needs of all its stakeholders the management system should enable it do to this and one standard that permits this system to be assessed for its capability to achieve differing objectives would suffice.
 
All it needs is for ISO 9000 to be modified so as to consider all stakeholders and hence all objectives and all the other management system standards would become obsolete.
 
However, this does not mean there might not be a need for other standards, say in stakeholder analysis, impact assessment, hazard analysis etc thus using standards for codifying specific methods and techniques for which they are better suited.
 
 


Best Regards
David Hoyle Hon.FCQI

Back to Top
 

Paul Simpson
Forum Moderator



Click to send Paul Simpson email.Personal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to Paul SimpsonAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jun 2005
Total Posts : 318
 
   Posted 10/07/2007 16:48 (GMT +1)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Just recently BSI has published the update to OHSAS 18001 here - does anyone have any further news on the nature of changes?


Regards, Paul Simpson
Looking for solutions
www.xbs.org.uk

Back to Top
 

David Hoyle
Registered Member

Click to send David Hoyle email.Click to visit David Hoyle's website.Send a Private Message to David HoyleAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Oct 2005
Total Posts : 484
 
   Posted 10/07/2007 17:35 (GMT +1)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Unfortunately not Paul but judging by all the changes made to align with ISO 14001 and ISO 9001:2000 they might as well have merged the three together and saved inidustry a lot of money but being cynical, they wouldn't do that because it would hurt their revenue.


Best Regards
David Hoyle Hon.FCQI

Back to Top
 

Paul Simpson
Forum Moderator



Click to send Paul Simpson email.Personal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to Paul SimpsonAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jun 2005
Total Posts : 318
 
   Posted 10/07/2007 17:45 (GMT +1)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Oooh, you are cynical, David! ;-)


Regards, Paul Simpson
Looking for solutions
www.xbs.org.uk

Back to Top
 

David Hoyle
Registered Member

Click to send David Hoyle email.Click to visit David Hoyle's website.Send a Private Message to David HoyleAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Oct 2005
Total Posts : 484
 
   Posted 10/07/2007 20:05 (GMT +1)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I still think the biggest mistake was that Michael Heseltine then head of DTI in 1983 decided, as he was a Tory, to make the certification industry a commercial enterprise so the Government of the day did not have to fund it. Thus they allowed it to become a competitive industry. They later set up UKAS to police it but that too is funded from the CBs.
He who pays the piper calls the tune. Price not quality drives certification. As customers cannot judge quality before they pay and they have no incentive to demand better quality certification as long as the product (the certficate) has equal currency in all markets. Only if certificate quality was a discriminator would price become secondary.
 
No, the answer is a Government Agency like the DVLC or Police doing all certifications and having an allegiance to the Crown. They would then come under the National Audit Office and be accountable to us "the people" and not their shareholders.


Best Regards
David Hoyle Hon.FCQI

Back to Top
 

Steve Coles
*********

Email Address Not AvailableClick to visit Steve Coles's website.Send a Private Message to Steve ColesAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Aug 2004
Total Posts : 405
 
   Posted 11/07/2007 12:50 (GMT +1)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Agree there, David. I once suggested (tongue-in-cheek) that, if a supplier engages a certification body to issue them with a certificate, and the contract specifies that the CB is required to comply with ISO9001 themselves, then they are obliged to meet their customer's contract and issue a certificate.

Seriously, I've long wished the CBs were funded independently and had public (or Crown) accountability.


Steve
<><

Back to Top
 

Paul Simpson
Forum Moderator



Click to send Paul Simpson email.Personal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to Paul SimpsonAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jun 2005
Total Posts : 318
 
   Posted 11/07/2007 18:41 (GMT +1)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
So in most other works of life people are trying to make government smaller and less intervention but the forum indicates that our esteemed posters believe more government involvement would be a good thing? Centralized planning for certification - that is one 5 year plan I would love to see! lol

I will confess to being a free marketer - the market has a tendency to sort itself out. Places like the forum help to make market corrections.

This form of instantaneous feedback gives power to the people, comrades. ;-)

On a semi-serious point most CBs have a contract to carry out assessment and their T & Cs clearly explain a certificate is not guaranteed at the end of the process - unless you go to some of the unaccredited bodies of course - anyone got a couple of cornflake box tops?


Regards, Paul Simpson
Looking for solutions
www.xbs.org.uk

Back to Top
 

Steve Coles
*********

Email Address Not AvailableClick to visit Steve Coles's website.Send a Private Message to Steve ColesAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Aug 2004
Total Posts : 405
 
   Posted 11/07/2007 19:31 (GMT +1)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
A free market may sort itself out in the long term but it can make a big mess in the meantime...

Think of a car rolling down a hill: the potential energy will eventually be dissipated but a lot will be converted to kinetic energy in the process and results in a messy end - why not apply some external, planned control and apply the brakes?

Of course, governments can also make a big mess (especially if we rely on democracy to provide the control - which is why I believe a benign dictatorship is the best option)!


Steve
<><

Back to Top
 

David Hoyle
Registered Member

Click to send David Hoyle email.Click to visit David Hoyle's website.Send a Private Message to David HoyleAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Oct 2005
Total Posts : 484
 
   Posted 16/07/2007 9:58 (GMT +1)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Maybe the Internet will see a change in the way the voice of the people
is heard by the elected politicians. David Cameron seems to think it might but like all processes we start using them before we know their capability and then retrospectively install controls that create more problems than they solve.
 
Can I get my neighbour to do anything about his tree that will eventually fall and demolish my summerhouse? No, I have to wait until it has demolished my summerhouse then I can claim on my insurance. We have the same warped logic for breaches in the speed limit and more seriously, death threats in family honour cases. We need laws that make it a crime not to take reasonable measures to prevent loss to property and people.


Best Regards
David Hoyle Hon.FCQI

Back to Top
 

Carpe Diem !
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to Carpe Diem !AIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jun 2007
Total Posts : 12
 
   Posted 27/07/2007 12:58 (GMT +1)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Chaps,
I'm amazed that a simple question about OHSAS 18001 can degenerate into a political mudslinging with talk of demolishing summer houses!
So......... "Should there be an ISO standard for health and safety?"
I would say it wouldn't harm. If a business wanted to use a framework against which to base a health and safety management system, ISO 18001 would probably suit them. If they then wanted to extend it to quality and the environment, the systems would relate fine.
What would be better is for ISO to produce a coherent integrated management systems standard which supersedes the existing ISO 9001 / 14001 and OHSAS 18001 standards. This wiould provide 'one stop shopping' and potentially go further to include financial management, marketing management, human resources management (systems) - perhaps it's time to consider the "Business Management System" which encompasses everything?
CD
Back to Top
 

David Hoyle
Registered Member

Click to send David Hoyle email.Click to visit David Hoyle's website.Send a Private Message to David HoyleAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Oct 2005
Total Posts : 484
 
   Posted 27/07/2007 14:13 (GMT +1)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I wouldn't call it mudslinging, but like many posts we do wander of track. However, the sentiment was about preventive measures that current legislation fails to address adequately in many areas one of which is health and safety.
 
You appear to agree with the thrust of our argument that instead of multiplying the number of management system standards, standards bodies should be aiming fro their reduction.
 
I tend to agree that a standard addressing "Business Management Systems" would be more appropriate but as we have hinted previously there are too many vested interests for this to be taken seriously. We did try to get a debate going on the "Future of Standands" but it appears to have dried up.
 
 


Best Regards
David Hoyle Hon.FCQI

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
 
Forum Information
Currently it is Thursday, September 09, 2010 8:18 AM (GMT +1)
There are a total of 3,162 posts in 774 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 3 new threads and 3 reply posts. View Active Threads
Who's Online
This forum has 1136 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, sue.
8 Guest(s), 0 Registered Member(s) are currently online.  Details